Saturday, February 28, 2009
sofiaecho: US promises to lobby for more countries to recognise Kosovo - reports
Friday, February 27, 2009
jta: Clinton set to name Posner to top rights job
Thursday, February 26, 2009
NYT/Rich: What We Don’t Know Will Hurt Us
NYT: With Spending Set, at Least for Now, the Knives Come Out
Wednesday, February 25, 2009
Tuesday, February 24, 2009
Jake Tapper - Gibbs Spouts Off Again
"Has the President weighed in on this?" a reporter asked [ Gibbs, Obama's press secretary ].
"I don't believe the President has," Gibbs said. "I can weigh in on it and say that it is not and will not be the policy of the Obama administration." [....]
In an interview with Congressional Quarterly, Oberstar said that LaHood "had the temerity to think...and what did he get? Slapped down. He's a good man. A decent man. Don't let him get slapped down by know-nothings."
Oberstar then suggested that Gibbs ought to stay out of the conversation on transportation policy.
"I've got news for you," Oberstar said, "transportation policy isn't going to be written in the press room of the White House."
AP - Defeated Politicians Still Unemployed
Some former members of Congress who lost in 2008 have yet to find new full-time jobs
ANDREW MIGA Associated Press Writer
AP
They're out of Congress and still out of work.
A handful of incumbents who lost last fall have yet to land new full-time jobs.
They include former Reps. Christopher Shays of Connecticut, Thelma Drake of Virginia and Nick Lampson of Texas. There's also former New Hampshire Sen. John E. Sununu, whose latest Washington assignment is only part-time.
A former top Bush administration official, too, has had trouble finding work. Former Attorney General Alberto Gonzales resigned under fire in September 2007...
Full Article at:http://www.newsweek.com/id/186258/output/print
Monday, February 23, 2009
Daily Beast: The Real Reason Bank Stocks Are Tanking
GPS: [ Hillary says sanctions did not work ]
Saturday, February 21, 2009
Toronto Star: Is Obama a closet conservative?
Times of India: India sidesteps US invite re Afganistan/Pakistan
India will officially keep its position of an "interested bystander" watching the unfolding events in this theatre.
India sought and received an assurance from the US that its decisions and policies in this region would not make India a "target". In other words, India doesn't want to be unpleasantly surprised by a set of events that adversely affects Indian interests in Afghanistan.
The US right now is furious with Afghanistan president Hamid Karzai for consistently hitting out at America but is equally wary of the Pakistan government particularly after the ill-advised "peace deal" with the Taliban in Swat Valley.
It's no secret the Obama administration wants Karzai to go.
Indian Express: Dead ends in Pakistan
The US wants to enlist us in the war in Afghanistan, and side with the Pakistani state in its war against the Taliban. But [India should not] get sucked into the way Americans define this war. On Pakistan, we frankly don't have many options but to show restraint. This is not a battle we can win militarily, although we have to be prepared for all eventualities. More at http://www.indianexpress.com/news/dead-ends-in-pakistan/426488/0 Comment form at the bottom. EASY POST. No login. Delay for moderation?
Friday, February 20, 2009
Fox: Rosen/Hillary interview transcript
Financial Times - Banks Likely to be Nationalized
By Francesco Guerrera and Aline van Duyn in New York and Krishna Guha in Washington
Published: February 20 2009 01:03 |
US bank shares hit a near 17-year low on Thursday on rising fears the government will have to nationalise troubled institutions such as Citigroup and Bank of America, wiping out investors and taking control of a large portion of the financial sector.
Bank of America shares slid 14 per cent to $3.93, their lowest point since 1984. Shares in Citi were down 13.8 per cent, closing at $2.51, their lowest since 1991. The KBW banks index fell to its lowest level since 1992. In the debt markets, Citi’s bonds were trading at distressed levels...
Full Article at: http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/d75e8598-fee6-11dd-b19a-000077b07658.html?nclick_check=1
Thursday, February 19, 2009
Powerlineblog -- Who's The Coward?
Attorney General Holder has called America "a nation of cowards" when it comes to "things racial." According to Holder, "average Americans" are afraid to "talk enough with each other about race."
By using the word "cowards," Holder has gotten himself some attention, at least for today. That's ironic because his long-winded speech is 99 percent content free.
To add to the irony, in the one place where Holder introduces a little content, he demonstrates that he has no interest in genuine dialogue, and reveals himself to be a "coward" on "things racial."
Here is Holder on the crucial issue of "affirmative action" (a coward's name for race-based preferences):
There can, for instance, be very legitimate debate about the question of affirmative action. This debate can, and should, be nuanced, principled and spirited. But the conversation that we now engage in as a nation on this and other racial subjects is too often simplistic and left to those on the extremes who are not hesitant to use these issues to advance nothing more than their own, narrow self interest.
So in one breath, Holder calls for a frank discussion of race, rather than the normal polite talk that evades tough issues; in the next breath, he attempts to rule out of the debate positions that he finds "extreme" while demonizing those who hold them. In the one instance where Holder is willing to be specific, we learn that his real complaint is not the absence of candid discussion, but rather the articulation of positions he doesn't like.
We have plenty of problems as a nation. I doubt that insufficient discussion of race is one of them. But if it is, Holder's mindset is part of the problem, not part of the solution.
Wednesday, February 18, 2009
German paper long transcription: Bill Clinton talks to Larry King
[ Long interview with Bill Clinton on many subjects ]
KING: Do you resent it when the Bush people say that this problem started with you, it started in your administration?
CLINTON: Well, they don't have much evidence for that. I always answer, does anyone seriously believe if the team I had in place had been in place for the last eight years that this would have happened?
And the answer to that is no. We had a much more vigorous regulatory environment with the Securities and Exchange Commission. We were watching these derivatives. I do think we should have done more on derivatives.
But the suggestion they have that because we required banks, for the first time, to live up to the requirements of the Community Reinvestment Law, which says you're supposed to loan money back to the people who deposit money in your bank, contributed to this, I just think is factually wrong.
If you look all over America, the community banks -- the ones that reinvested in their communities -- were not the people that caused this problem. They did well.
Much more at:
http://www.welt.de/english-news/article3227431/Bill-Clinton-talks-to-Larry-King.html
Kelly: Obama is Big on Symbolism
Latest posts from Midstream News
NYT - Bailout Robbing Banks?
The Bailout Is Robbing the Banks
By JOHN C. COATES and DAVID S. SCHARFSTEIN
Published: February 17, 2009
MANY Americans are angry at banks for taking bailout money while still cutting back on lending. But the government is also to blame. For reasons that remain unclear, the Troubled Asset Relief Program has channeled aid to bank holding companies rather than banks. The Obama administration’s new Financial Stability Plan will have more influence on bank lending if it actually directs its support to banks.
Full article at: http://www.nytimes.com/2009/02/18/opinion/18scharfstein.html?_r=1&th&emc=th
TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 17, 2009
Bloomberg - Stock Market Woes
By Elizabeth Stanton
Feb. 17 (Bloomberg) -- U.S. stocks tumbled to a three-month low, extending a global slump, as a record contraction in New York manufacturing spurred concern the government’s stimulus package won’t be enough to curb the deepening recession.
Bank of America Corp., Citigroup Inc. and JPMorgan Chase & Co. each lost 12 percent. Exxon Mobil Corp. was the biggest drag on the Standard & Poor’s 500 Index as oil slid almost 7 percent. General Motors Corp., the largest U.S. carmaker, sank 13 percent as it took its case for more government support to the Treasury Department. Banks led declines in Europe and Asia on concern they may face ratings downgrades and more losses.
Full Article at: http://bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=a3VqcI4keryE&refer=home